Clothes should be worn according to your own taste, not for society or others

 Clothes should be worn according to your own taste, not for society or others

Nowadays, fashion changes every two days and there are many options for new and stylish clothes for women.

Society dictates the style of dressing according to the occasion, but preference should be given to wearing clothes that you like.

The decision to wear clothes affects mental health and one should give importance to one's choice.

Nowadays, fashion changes every two days, that is, the style of clothing is constantly changing. In such a situation, there are many options for girls and women. Every girl or woman wants to wear new and stylish clothes. However, they hesitate to wear clothes that they like because of what others will say or whether this dress suits their body.

Women with very fat bodies do not like wearing tight clothes. They think that sleeveless clothes will not suit them because they have a thin body, or they find it uncomfortable to wear black clothes because they are light-skinned. However, you should try on all types of clothes once. You should wear whatever your heart desires.

You should keep in mind that this is my body and it should be my choice. If you want to wear comfortable clothes that you can wear at home even when you go out, then you should wear those. You should dress according to your preferences and needs, not to show others.

Give priority to your choice

Society has prescribed a style of dressing according to an occasion or environment. Every society has a custom of wearing clothes of specific colors on occasions of mourning. The colors of clothes are different in festive atmospheres. At a wedding, the bride is expected to wear a heavy lehenga-choli and veil. But if you do not feel comfortable in such clothes, then you should be able to say no to them.

Even in the Christian and Muslim communities, there are prescribed styles of clothes, but why such restrictions?

If you want to wear a plain sari or lehenga instead of a colorful and heavy sari or lehenga at a wedding, then you should wear that. You should not think about what others will say. If the groom understands and has no objections, then this is a good thing. But if he insists that you have to wear this dress, then you should not hesitate to break up with such a person. Because if desires and preferences are not given importance, how can you be happy with such a spouse or family?

Similarly, if you feel comfortable getting married wearing a heavy lehenga and you like traditional clothes, then do that. The point here is only about desires and preferences, which should not be changed for others. When it comes to clothes, you should always give your own preferences first.

Impact on mental health

Have you ever decided to dress according to social standards? Have you ever worn a certain dress but changed it because it does not suit your body? Many people do this sometimes. But clothes have a huge impact on mental health. Knowingly or unknowingly, you start dressing according to the preferences of others, and you may not even be aware of it. But such habits can affect mental health.

Every time you stand in front of the mirror and are told that this dress does not suit you or that it looks bad in this dress, you should understand that your mental health is at risk. Trying to conform to social standards of beauty can affect not only mental health but also physical health.

How you look in front of others is very important. Everyone wants to be seen positively. This old beauty mindset makes you believe that there is something wrong with your body. People around you make fun of your weight or advise you to lose weight. These things make you believe that there is something wrong with your body. So you stop wearing the clothes you like.

Models, influencers, and celebrities are looked up to. They dress in a certain style and look a certain way. You try to be like them. When you look different from what is shown, you feel disappointed.

The impact of this mindset on mental health

If you check the standards of society every time before choosing clothes and dress accordingly, it can affect your self-esteem. Thinking about a bad body image can lead to negative thoughts.

If you don't wear the clothes you like because you don't fit your body or because you think people will look at you negatively, it also reduces your confidence. Therefore, dressing should be your choice, not society's.

Freedom means something different to everyone. Wearing the clothes you like is a right. Many girls like to wear all kinds of clothes, but only wear the clothes their family members tell them to wear. It is wrong to do this. You should wear clothes according to your own choice, not under the pressure of society and family.

The World-System Perspective - according to sociology

 The World-System Perspective - according to sociology

World-systems theory, developed by sociologist Immanuel Wallerstein in the 1970s, provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the complex interrelations of global economies and societies. This theory categorizes countries into three main groups—core, semi-periphery, and periphery—based on their economic power and roles within the global capitalist system. 

## Core Concepts of World-Systems Theory

### 1. **Structure of the World System**

The world is viewed as a single economic system rather than a collection of independent nation-states. Wallerstein's model emphasizes the importance of global economic structures and how they shape the relationships between countries. 

- **Core Countries**: These are economically dominant nations characterized by high levels of industrialization, advanced technology, and significant political power. Core countries exploit peripheral nations for raw materials and labor while maintaining a high standard of living. Examples include the United States, Germany, and Japan.

- **Peripheral Countries**: These nations are often less developed, economically dependent on core countries, and primarily provide raw materials and cheap labor. They typically experience lower levels of industrialization and higher rates of poverty. Many countries in Africa and parts of Latin America fall into this category.

- **Semi-Peripheral Countries**: These countries share characteristics of both core and peripheral nations. They may exploit peripheral countries while also being exploited by core countries. Examples include Brazil, India, and South Africa. They often serve as a buffer between the core and periphery, exhibiting both economic growth and poverty.

### 2. **Historical Context and Development**

Wallerstein traces the origins of the modern world system back to the "long" 16th century, around 1450 to 1640, marking the transition from feudalism to capitalism. He argues that the rise of capitalism was not a linear process but rather a complex outcome of historical developments, including colonialism and the global trade networks established during this period. 

The theory builds on earlier concepts such as dependency theory, which posits that the wealth of core countries is derived from the exploitation of peripheral nations. However, world-systems theory expands this idea by incorporating a more dynamic understanding of how countries can shift between core, semi-peripheral, and peripheral statuses based on changes in global economic conditions.

## Implications of World-Systems Theory

### 1. **Global Inequality**

World-systems theory provides a lens through which to examine global inequality. It highlights how the economic exploitation inherent in the capitalist system perpetuates disparities between nations. Core countries benefit from the labor and resources of peripheral countries, leading to a cycle of poverty and underdevelopment in the latter.

### 2. **Social Unrest and Political Dynamics**

The theory also addresses the social and political implications of global economic structures. As peripheral countries struggle against exploitation, they may experience social unrest, political instability, and movements for change. This can lead to shifts in power dynamics within the world system, as some countries may rise to semi-peripheral or even core status over time.

### 3. **Critiques and Limitations**

While world-systems theory has been influential, it has faced criticism for its perceived oversimplification of complex global relationships. Critics argue that it may downplay the role of cultural factors and local contexts in shaping national development. Additionally, the rigid categorization of countries into core, semi-periphery, and periphery can overlook the nuances of individual nations' experiences and the fluidity of their economic statuses.

## Conclusion

World-systems theory offers a robust framework for analyzing the interconnectedness of global economies and the underlying structures that drive inequality and exploitation. By focusing on the world-system as a primary unit of analysis, it encourages a broader understanding of social change and economic development that transcends traditional nation-state boundaries. As global dynamics continue to evolve, the insights provided by world-systems theory remain relevant for understanding the complexities of contemporary global relations and the ongoing challenges of inequality and exploitation in the capitalist world economy[1][2][3][4][5][6][7].

Citations:

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World-systems_theory

[2] https://web.mit.edu/esd.83/www/notebook/WorldSystem.pdf

[3] https://www.studysmarter.co.uk/explanations/human-geography/economic-geography/world-systems-theory/

[4] https://study.com/learn/lesson/world-systems-theory-wallerstein.html

[5] https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/world-systems-theory

[6] https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Sociology/Introduction_to_Sociology/Sociology_%28Boundless%29/08:_Global_Stratification_and_Inequality/8.06:_Sociological_Theories_and_Global_Inequality/8.6I:_World-Systems_Theory

[7] https://revisesociology.com/2015/12/05/world-systems-theory/

[8] https://egyankosh.ac.in/bitstream/123456789/84308/1/Unit-6%20%281%29.pdf